Barrel-Aged Beer at The Refuge

Tonight I had dinner at The Refuge in San Carlos, CA. I had the pleasure of drinking a fine Belgian-style beer from Maine that was matured in ex-Bourbon barrels: Allagash Curieux.

The aromas of the Bourbon came through nicely. I really liked this beer! Here is the brewer’s description:

Allagash Curieux

In October of 2004, we released the first beer in our series of Barrel Aged beers, Allagash Curieux. To make the Curieux (French for “curious”), we age our Tripel Ale in Jim Beam barrels for 8 weeks in our cellar. During the aging process in bourbon barrels, the beer is totally transformed, and many new flavors and aromas develop. Most notably, the beer picks up soft coconut and vanilla characteristics…and also a hint of bourbon flavor!

Available in: 750 ml bottle and 5.17 gal kegs

ABV: 9.5% – 10.5%
Original Gravity: 1080
Recommended Serving Temperature: 55°F
Recommended Cellaring Temperature: 55°F

This was a strong beer in terms of ABV, so I only had the one. The flavor profile is light and I’d probably seek it out again when the weather is warmer. Tonight I dined outdoors and it was in the low 50s (Fahrenheit!), so it’s not exactly Summer (or even Spring) here, yet.

The next time I’m in Durham, New Hampshire (maybe in June…), I will definitely drive the one hour North to Portland, Maine to visit the nice folks at Allagash. I am very interested in the interplay between whisk(e)y and beer, so I feel like this trip is mandatory!

Bruichladdich “DNA” – Maybe the Rarest Bruichladdich

A relatively new expression, and a very very rare one, consists of about 900 individually numbered bottles at cask strength (in this case, 41%…these are, or were, very old casks!). What makes this expression rare, besides the fact that this is some of the oldest Bruichladdich spirit in their warehouse? The DNA expression was finished in fine French oak barrels that previously contained some of the [sometimes] most expensive red wine in the world: Château Le Pin.

Very Very Rare

Very Very Rare

The finished product is approximately 40 years old. Before being finished in the Le Pin casks, 80% of the constituent whisky in this expression was aged in Bourbon casks, the remaining 20% in Sherry butts.

One reason that Bruichladdich is able to use wood in creative ways (their ACE process) is, I think, the fact that Jim McEwan has a background as a cooper, in addition to his subsequent distilling experience. He really knows what kinds of wood will bring out the best in a particular whisky. The Bruichladdich management team’s familiarity with the wine business is also strongly at play here (as it was with their Bordeaux “First Growth” series) because they knew that the Le Pin casks would be perfect for this particular, very old, Bruichladdich spirit.

Given the rarity, I was bowled over by the price: It’s under £500 — the Laddie Shop offers it for only £391.48 (at current exchange rates, that’s “only” $567.10). That’s about 3x my comfort level for a whisky, but given the rarity it sounds extremely reasonable. Bruichladdich only has 12 available for online ordering. If you do manage to try it, please taunt me with a description. Definitely don’t just buy it and keep it on the shelf, or to pass along on eBay. In my opinion, I am not in favor of people collecting whisky just to keep it — I think that does a disservice to the fine folks that made it when you don’t enjoy the fruit of their labors. Also, I never miss an opportunity to share really special whisky with my friends (and they do the same for me).

Why Mention Casks?

I’ve written about wood before. The previous article talked in detail about casks because they are important to so many different kinds of maturing alcoholic beverages that it is useful to see the big picture: Where do casks come from and how are they used? You might think that a cask is a cask is a cask, but that’s not true at all. At least in the Scotch whisky business, distillers pay very close attention to their cask supplies, and even have job titles involving “wood management.” Casks are not an afterthought.

We saw that many ex-Bourbon barrels end up in Scotland — but they aren’t all alike. In order to maintain a steady supply of barrels of the same type and with the same flavor characteristics, various Scotch distillers have long-term arrangements with Bourbon producers — to the point where a multi-national corporation that owns a Scotch distillery might acquire a Bourbon distillery just so they have more direct control over the sourcing of the wood used in the barrels that will age their Scotch. There are specialist cooperages that are tied to certain Bourbon distilleries that use particular shapes, toast levels, residual moisture levels, etc.

As with much of the Scotch production process, details matter. To deliver a consistent product, year after year, decade after decade, it’s critical to keep track of all these details. The production of the new make spirit takes only weeks, from malting to mashing to distillation (months if you include growing the barley), whereas the aging takes years or decades. You had better get this part right or your careful production of the spirit will come to naught.

The Life and Times of Casks

The occupation of cooper has been one of the most important for many centuries. Prior to the invention of glass, wooden vessels (barrels) were the preferred way to store liquids. Other than earthenware containers, they were probably the only practical way to store liquids. There are many kinds of barrel designs, not all of which are water-tight. A water-tight barrel is the pinnacle of the cooper’s art.

To say that the cooper is one of the most important jobs involved in the production of whisky is not much of an overstatement. But the whisk(e)y business is not the only business for which barrels are important: Cask-conditioned ale is aged in wood barrels. Port and Sherry are, too. And of course, Bourbon whiskey. And wine, rum and many other types of distilled spirits and fermented beverages.

Because of American law, Bourbon must be aged in new oak barrels. These cannot be reused. So the Bourbon industry generates a prodigious amount of used barrels. I have read recently due to the recent strong growth in the popularity of Bourbon whiskey, the demand for American oak suitable for Bourbon barrels has effectively reached parity with the available supply. Basically, as fast as the right kind of oak trees mature, they are cut down for barrels. This is a staggering fact!

The structural surplus of American oak Bourbon barrels has had a noticeable effect on the style of Scotch whisky. 100 years ago, Scotch was primarily stored and aged in European oak. Since the end of Prohibition in the US, the “waste” barrels from Bourbon production were available, and these American oak barrels found their way to Scotland where they were increasingly used for the Scotch whisky industry’s storage needs. Mark Reynier, CEO of Bruichladdich, wrote extensively on this topic in a blog comment on the What Does John Know blog (the “John” in the title is John Hansell, editor/publisher of Malt Advocate magazine).

A cask (barrel) is born near where it will be first used. If it’s from European oak, it’s probably used for wine or Sherry or Port. If it’s American oak, odds are it will become a Bourbon barrel. Sherry barrels are called “butts;” Port barrels are called “pipes.” Once used, they may be re-used for their original purpose, but many find their way to Scotland (or Japan, or any other whisky-producing region) to be used in aging or finishing of whisky.

Once used for whisky aging, these barrels are classified by the number of times they have been used. For instance, first-fill Sherry casks, second-fill, and so on. A barrel that has been used multiple times may still be quite useful. A second- or third-fill cask may be desirable precisely because it’s not presenting an overabundance of Sherry or Port notes. Even Bourbon barrels may be valuable in a second-fill applications. It depends on the degree to which the barrel has retained its ability to impart wood notes to the contents. Eventually, the barrel will lose its “flavor” and it will no longer be useful. This may well take many decades.

So we have established that casks are used for a mini-ecosystem wherein barrels are used first for one application, then used again. At first glance, Scotch seems to be the end of the road for the barrels. Whether they started as Bourbon barrels, Sherry butts or Port pipes, they all seem to eventually end up in Scotland (or in the production of whisk(e)y). I have never heard of Scotch being aged in a beer barrel, though interestingly there are new beers that have been at least partially aged in Scotch barrels.

The micro-distillation revolution in the United States is stretching the boundaries of how casks are used. It’s a very exciting time to be in the whisk(e)y business. You can stay up to date with my list of American whisk(e)y producers on the Whisky2.0 blog. For a few off the top of my head, there are: Charbay, Tuthilltown, Stranahans, Old Potrero, and St. George. There are many others.

A Wonderful Tribute

Peat is all the rage these days in Scotch whisky. It seems that whisky lovers can’t get enough of it. Bruichladdich has produced Octomore, first made from malt peated at 80.5 ppm phenol, now made from malt peated at 131 ppm. Ardbeg just released their Supernova, peated at about 100 ppm. Both of these are significantly higher than Port Charlotte, peated at about 40 ppm. Peat is also prominent in the Bruichladdich 3D, 3rd Edition (3D3 for short), which first shipped in 2006. It was produced in tribute to Norrie Cambell, the last traditional peat cutter on Islay. Bruichladdich has this to say about 3D3:

Bruichladdich 3D3

Bruichladdich 3D3

3D3 is the third version of 3D – the peated Multi-Vintage Bruichladdich. This single malt selected from several vintages is even more peaty than the previous two releases due to the debut of the mighty Octomore – the heaviest peated whisky in the world at a whopping 80.5 ppm. Combined with other versions of the Bruichladdich it makes for an awesomely complex and layered version of Bruichladdich: peat without the medicine. Listen to Jim McEwan’s Podcast here. For more information click here. For a tasting note please click here.

I got this bottle today as an early Valentine’s Day present. I’m a very lucky man! This is one smooth malt. The peat is very well balanced and the fruit is not overshadowed. Yes, it’s complex, but not shockingly so. There isn’t overwhelming sweetness (the color might make you assume there would be a lot of sherry sweetness, but there is nothing approaching treacle), and the mouth feel is slightly oily, which I suppose is what helps leave such a nice finish.

I paid just over $60, and I think that’s a good price for such a well-executed product. Yes, there are peatier whiskies on the market, but speaking for myself, I don’t buy exclusively based on phenol ppm. When I am in the mood for whisky, peat is not the only thing that determines which I will select. The 3D3 is a good example of a whisky that uses peat as an ingredient to complement the rest of the product, not to dominate it. (Now, I’m not saying that Octomore or Ardbeg’s Supernova are just peat with no other flavor. In fact, I’ve heard that they aren’t as peaty as the numbers make it sound. I would like to be able to sample them and I’ll see what I think at that point.)

The 3D3 is peaty, but it’s a gentle peatiness compared to, for example the Port Charlotte PC5, which is quite a stormy beast! Despite the fact that they both rate around 40 ppm phenols (the 3D3 was a combination of several different malts, vatted together so the ppm value is approximate), there is a vast difference in flavor. The more different whiskies I try, the more I realize that they can’t be reduced to numbers. There are bad whiskies, to be sure, but I luckily haven’t purchased any to date. Among those that I own, or have tasted, there are so many nuances that I can’t imagine how hard it is for professionals to rank them. For me, I can just say that this is an interesting Bruichladdich because it’s a blend of old and new, and the peat aspect is very well executed, to my non-professional palate.

To Norrie, I say: Slainte!

Holiday Party

No. That’s not a typo! My company has its holiday party after the end of our Fiscal Year, which ends 31-Jan. I’m looking forward to having some really fine whisk(e)y this evening and I’ll report back tomorrow.

Crystal Malt

I recently enjoyed one of my favorite blended Irish whiskeys: Bushmills 1608. No, it’s not 400+ years old! Distilling in or around the town of Bushmills has been going on for that long. In fact, the license to disil [sic] was granted to Old Bushmills Distillery in 1608, hence the name of the expression. Part of what is claimed to make Bushmills 1608 smooth is the eponymous name of this article: “Crystal Malt,” along with the grain whiskey and careful blending. But what is crystal malt? A malting process? A type of barley? A way of processing a particular type of barley?

I’ve often wondered about the amazing variety of single-malt Scotch whisky: So many expressions (on the order of thousands) from basically three ingredients (water, malted barley and yeast). It seems so simple, but no two whiskies are so close to each other as to be indiscernable. From what does this variety emerge? Well, like anything that appears simple, it’s not. Whisk(e)y is a natural product, made from naturally occurring ingredients. There is a lot of variability in the process, but people are ingenious: Distilleries manage to turn out products that reliably reproduce the previous year’s product — when they want to.

Water sources matter somewhat. Barley isn’t one kind of plant: There are lots of varieties. At least 6 types are used in the production of Scotch. And all barley within a given variety isn’t identical: Was the soil too high in Nitrogen? Too low? Too wet? Not wet enough? You get the idea. Was the growing season hot? Cold? Just right? Then there is the preparation of the malt: Did the malt get peated? If so: How much? Even if unpeated, was it processed the same amount of time at the exact same temperature? What was the barley’s initial moisture content?  Was the malt comprised of just a single farmer’s barley? The fingerprint of the malt is the foundation of the whole process.

The production of Scotch is heavily regulated as to the ingredients, their preparation and all of the production techniques, yet these significant constraints still allow enough flexibility for the thousands of expressions of single-malt Scotch whisky. Based on a cursory web search, crystal malt isn’t used in the production of single-malt Scotch whisky. But if it’s used to make beer, it can be used to make whiskey (I spell generic whiskey with 7 letters, whereas I spell Scotch whisky with only 6 letters in the word “whisky;” many other kinds of whisky adopt the Scotch spelling, but not all do).

All across America, and the rest of the world, there is a re-emergence of distilled spirits, including whisk(e)y. Late 2008/early 2009 episodes of the WhiskyCast podcast have included interviews with some of the pioneers of this new (and simultaneously not-new!) business. Micro-distilleries are producing beer-based whisky (Charbay, here in Northern California, recently made whiskey from a Pilsner beer!). These would not necessarily be single-malt whiskeys, but they would be a beverage distilled from a cereal grain-based beer-like substance, so technically they are whisk(e)y.

Crystal malt is available in a variety of colors, and they were heated enough that some of their sugars are caramelized after being converted from more complex starches to simpler sugars while still inside the barley. Once caramelized, the simple sugars are unfermentable. Remember: The fermentation of the mash is what creates the alcohol. Yeast is added which converts the simple sugars to alcohol. Since crystal malts contain no enzymes, they cannot (by themselves) be used to create a mash for fermentation. They can be added to a mash bill to sweeten it. Crystal malts also noticeably smooth the mouth feel of beer when they are part of the mash bill; this mouth feel derives from the more complex sugars that are present in the malt.

Strictly speaking, crystal malt needs no mashing, so you can make beer without needing to make a mash. The mash, if you recall, is when you add the grist (ground up malt) to hot water so that the enzymes from inside the barley can convert the starches to simple(r) sugars. Because crystal malt already contains simple sugars, a home brewer can go straight from grist to fermentation.

So crystal malt is a process: You stew green (undried) barley in warm water which activates the enzymes inside the barley. This is what normally happens in the mash tun when the grist (ground malt) is steeped in hot water. In the crystal malt process, the enzymes act within the barley, and when the barley is dried, the converted sugars crystallize (hence the name). The whole process of making crystal malt is outlined at this home brewing blog. After the crystal malt process is complete, you can make it into a grist and add water and yeast, which ferments the sugars as usual.

It’s clear that crystal malt is advantageous in beer production, since it lets home brewers skip the step of mashing. And anything that can be used to make beer can be used in the production of whisky (though not Scotch whisky).

New Header Image

I cropped this from the Islay Photo Blog. The photographer, Armin Grewe, is credited at the top of the third column of this blog layout.

The Basics of Distillation; Part 3

You’ll probably hear some unfamiliar terms in discussing the actual process of distillation. These terms appear in distilling brandy and whisky; I don’t know about white spirits like Vodka and Gin. One term is: Low wines. What does wine have to do with whisky? My theory is that this term probably came from some of the first applications of [double] distillation: Making brandy, which is distilled wine. So what’s low about it? Well, I suspect that the “low” comes from the fact that the ABV isn’t high enough yet, meaning the low wines have to be further distilled.

What about these: Foreshots? Heads? Middle cut? Feints? Tails? A “cut” is when the output of a pot still changes from undesirable to desirable (or vice versa). When the cut is made, the liquid output from the still is literally redirected to a different receiver (container). “Heads” (also known as “foreshots”) precede the “middle cut,” which precedes the “tails” (also known as “feints”). The “heads” or “foreshots” can contain unsafe or unpalatable chemicals. The “middle cut” is the desired output of the pot still. The “tails” or “feints” are what comes out of the still after sufficient alcohol has been extracted from the still such that the concentration in the output is no longer high enough.

We already know that the distillation process for Scotch takes at least two passes. The first pass is performed by the wash still, which takes the beery contents of the washback and concentrates the alcohol content to create the “low wines,” the output of the first step of distillation. The low wines are the middle cut of the wash still. According to this description, the foreshots off the wash still are discarded into animal feed. I have heard that a stillman (the person who operates the still; sorry for the politically incorrect term!) can tell by smell when the “middle cut” begins. The resulting low wines are 15-20% ABV, about double the alcohol concentration of the wash. Here are two additional descriptions of the distillation process, with decent diagrams.

It’s useful to step back and remember what’s happening here. The big picture is that distillation is a process of taking a liquid mixture that contains lots of chemicals with different boiling points, boiling the lot of them, and controlling the condensation process. The more volatile liquids will boil sooner than the less volatile liquids, so they can be preferentially captured since they will condense sooner. The pot still is not a continuous process. It is filled (the official term is: charged), and heated until virtually empty, then charged again for the next batch. (There are other types of stills that operate continuously, but they are not used in the production of Single-Malt Scotch Whisky. You’ll find them in petroleum distillation, Single-Grain Scotch Whisky distillation, and many other chemical engineering applications.)

The second step in the distillation process is another pot still known as the spirit still. The spirit still’s foreshots may be recycled into the wash still for the next pass. For most Scotch whisky, the middle cut is the final output: New make spirit. As with any pot still, the feints are too weak and are captured and recycled into earlier stages of the process. After the second distillation, the ABV is 65-70%, which strongly depends on the alcohol content of the low wines, which in turn strongly depended on the alcohol concentration of the wash.

Lowland Scotch Whisky and Irish Whiskey is distilled a third time, through a second spirit safe. The resulting new make spirit might be around 80% ABV. Since the spirit used to charge the second spirit still is already fairly concentrated in terms of ABV, this additional step doesn’t increase the ABV as much as the pass through the first spirit still did. Occasionally, Single-Malt Scotch Whisky is distilled a fourth time. Bruichladdich recently did this with their “X4 (Perilous Whisky).” The final ABV of that product was 90%…you can see that each step is giving diminishing returns in terms of ABV. On the other hand, there was enough Ethanol in this product to run a Formula 1 racing car.

Aside on ABV: A higher ABV has an interesting effect. Because alcohol’s boiling point is less than human body temperature, when a high-ABV whisky hits the tongue the alcohol “flashes” — it evaporates very quickly. This carries aromas to the nose that may not be obvious before you taste. Keep in mind that the ABV of the final bottled product is less than the ABV of the new make spirit that goes into the spirit safe because the aging process reduces the ABV by up to 3% per year in Scotland, depending on seasonal humidity and temperature variations.

Thanks to the First 3300

Well, as far as WordPress is concerned, it’s 2009. And the final numbers for 2008 are stunning (at least to me!):

2008-08: 0209 0209 visitors
2008-09: 0500 0709 (monthly, cumulative)
2008-10: 0621 1330
2008-11: 0889 2219
2008-12: 1081 3300 *
2009-01: 0003 3303 (so far!)

* Yes, the year ended on a round number, but only because WordPress is in GMT.

Steady Growth

Steady Growth

In a little while, the whole world will have joined WordPress in 2009. I look forward to continuing to bring you whisky news and information. If you like the blog, tell your friends.

Again, thanks for visiting and have a wonderful New Year! Slainte!!!

Older entries »